4.2 Article

Iron chelation therapy associated with improvement of hematopoiesis in transfusion-dependent patients

Journal

TRANSFUSION
Volume 50, Issue 7, Pages 1568-1570

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2010.02617.x

Keywords

-

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BACKGROUND: It is well known that iron overload may cause multiple organ failure. In chronically transfused patients, optimal iron chelation therapy is associated with reduced morbidity and mortality. Furthermore, chelation therapy has been associated with erythroid responses. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Among chronically transfused adults affected by myeloproliferative neoplasms and treated with iron chelators, two case reports are described. CASE REPORT: A male adult patient with myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) and a female adult with aplastic anemia (AA), both transfusion-dependent, were treated with deferasirox, an oral iron chelator. RESULTS: A significant reduction in transfusion requirement was observed and was dependent on chelation therapy. The patient affected by AA also experienced a significant increase in hemoglobin levels. Minimal doses of deferasirox maintained the erythroid responses. Many mechanisms of action of the drug on erythropoiesis have been postulated. The early erythroid response seems to be independent of the removal of iron from deposits, per se, since the reduction of ferritin levels (a surrogate marker of iron deposits) below threshold levels occurs as a later event. CONCLUSION: Although there are few reports on erythroid responses in patients undergoing iron chelation therapy, they may give new insights in the pathogenesis of MDS and other myeloproliferative neoplasms. AA may benefit in terms of erythroid response. The findings in these cases underline the clinical importance of treating patients with iron overload. A survival benefit of chelation in patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms is still to be confirmed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available