4.2 Article

Inositol hexaphosphate-loaded red blood cells prevent in vitro sickling

Journal

TRANSFUSION
Volume 50, Issue 10, Pages 2176-2184

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2010.02663.x

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. French ANR (Agence Nationale pour la Recherche) [ANR-08-BIOT-011-01]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BACKGROUND: Hypoxia is a major cause of painful vaso-occlusive crisis in sickle cell disease (SCD). Simple transfusion and red blood cell (RBC) exchange are commonly used as preventive therapies whose aim is to dilute hemoglobin (Hb)S-containing RBCs (SS-RBCs) with normal RBCs (AA-RBCs) to prevent sickling. We hypothesized that the effectiveness of transfusion could be improved by the encapsulation of inositol hexaphosphate (IHP), an allosteric Hb effector, in transfused AA-RBCs. Indeed, apart from their diluting effect on SS-RBCs, IHP-loaded RBCs (IHP-RBCs) with increased oxygen release capacity could palliate in vivo oxygen deprivation and reduce sickling. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: The study was designed to investigate the therapeutic effect of IHP-RBCs transfusion on in vitro sickling of SS-RBCs collected from 20 SCD patients. Patients' RBCs were diluted with various proportions of IHP-RBCs or AA-RBCs (processed or stored RBCs as controls). Resulting suspensions were subjected to deoxygenation followed by partial reoxygenation at 5% oxygen. Sickling was evaluated by microscopy. RESULTS: Stored RBCs (50% dose) used to mimic simple transfusion exhibited a poor antisickling effect (5.6%) and a low response rate (65%). In contrast, IHP-RBCs treatment was seven times more effective resulting in 35% of sickling reduction and a 94% response rate. Sickling was inhibited in a dose-dependent manner: 9.9, 25.1, and 35.0% for IHP-RBCs in percentages of 10, 30, and 50%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Our results indicate that IHP-RBCs prevent in vitro sickling and suggest that it could improve conventional transfusion therapy in terms of transfused volume, frequency, and efficacy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available