4.7 Article

Mapping Oil Palm Plantations in Cameroon Using PALSAR 50-m Orthorectified Mosaic Images

Journal

REMOTE SENSING
Volume 7, Issue 2, Pages 1206-1224

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/rs70201206

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NASA Land Cover and Land Use Change program [NNX11AJ35G, NNX14AD78G]
  2. US National Science Foundation EPSCoR program [IIA-1301789]
  3. National Institutes of Health [1R01AI101028-01A1]
  4. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41201340]
  5. Chinese Universities Scientific Fund [2012QJ157]
  6. Fulbright Graduate Student Fellowship
  7. NASA [NNX11AJ35G, 143457] Funding Source: Federal RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Oil palm plantations have expanded rapidly. Estimating either positive effects on the economy, or negative effects on the environment, requires accurate maps. In this paper, three classification algorithms (Support Vector Machine (SVM), Decision Tree and K-Means) were explored to map oil palm plantations in Cameroon, using PALSAR 50 m Orthorectified Mosaic images and differently sized training samples. SVM had the ideal performance with overall accuracy ranging from 86% to 92% and a Kappa coefficient from 0.76 to 0.85, depending upon the training sample size (ranging from 20 to 500 pixels per class). The advantage of SVM was more obvious when the training sample size was smaller. K-Means required the user's intervention, and thus, the accuracy depended on the level of his/her expertise and experience. For large-scale mapping of oil palm plantations, the Decision Tree algorithm outperformed both SVM and K-Means in terms of speed and performance. In addition, the decision threshold values of Decision Tree for a large training sample size agrees with the results from previous studies, which implies the possible universality of the decision threshold. If it can be verified, the Decision Tree algorithm will be an easy and robust methodology for mapping oil palm plantations.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available