4.2 Article

Clinical outcomes after platelet transfusions in patients with thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura

Journal

TRANSFUSION
Volume 49, Issue 5, Pages 873-887

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2008.02082.x

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. University of Oklahoma
  2. Swiss National Science Foundation [3200B0-108261]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Reports of deterioration and death after platelet (PLT) transfusions in patients with thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP) have led to recommendations that they should not be given except for life-threatening hemorrhage. Published reports of PLT transfusions in patients with TTP were systematically reviewed and data from the Oklahoma TTP-HUS Registry, an inception cohort of 382 consecutive patients, 1989 through 2007, were analyzed. A systematic review identified 34 publications describing outcomes of patients with TTP after PLT transfusions: 9 articles attributed complications to PLT transfusions, 4 suggested that they may be safe, and 21 articles did not comment about a relation between PLT transfusions and outcomes. Fifty-four consecutive patients from the Oklahoma TTP-HUS Registry were prospectively analyzed. ADAMTS13 activity was less than 10 percent in 47 patients; also included were 7 patients whose activity was not measured but who may have been deficient. Thirty-three (61%) patients received PLT transfusions. The frequency of death was not different between the two groups (p = 0.971): 8 (24%) patients who received PLT transfusions died (thrombosis, 5; hemorrhage, 1; sepsis, 2) and 5 (24%) patients who did not receive PLT transfusions died (thrombosis, 4; hemorrhage, 1). The frequency of severe neurologic events was also not different (p = 0.190): 17 (52%) patients who received PLT transfusions (in 5 of these 17 patients, neurologic events only occurred before PLT transfusions) and 7 (33%) patients who did not receive PLT transfusions. Evidence for harm from PLT transfusions in patients with TTP is uncertain.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available