4.7 Article

Airborne LiDAR Detects Selectively Logged Tropical Forest Even in an Advanced Stage of Recovery

Journal

REMOTE SENSING
Volume 7, Issue 7, Pages 8348-8367

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/rs70708348

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. European Union under the EuropeAid Programme, as a part of the Across the River Transboundary Peace Park Project [DCI/ENV/2008/151-577]
  2. Cambridge Conservation Initiative Collaborative Fund grant Applications of airborne remote sensing to the conservation management of a West African National Park
  3. ERC grant Africa GHG [247349]
  4. British Technion Society

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Identifying historical forest disturbances is difficult, especially in selectively logged areas. LiDAR is able to measure fine-scale variations in forest structure over multiple kilometers. We use LiDAR data from ca. 16 km(2) of forest in Sierra Leone, West Africa, to discriminate areas of old-growth from areas recovering from selective logging for 23 years. We examined canopy height variation and gap size distributions. We found that though recovering blocks of forest differed little in height from old-growth forest (up to 3 m), they had a greater area of canopy gaps (average 10.2% gap fraction in logged areas, compared to 5.6% in unlogged area); and greater numbers of gaps penetrating to the forest floor (162 gaps at 2 m height in logged blocks, and 101 in an unlogged block). Comparison of LiDAR measurements with field data demonstrated that LiDAR delivered accurate results. We found that gap size distributions deviated from power-laws reported previously, with substantially fewer large gaps than predicted by power-law functions. Our analyses demonstrate that LiDAR is a useful tool for distinguishing structural differences between old-growth and old-secondary forests. That makes LiDAR a powerful tool for REDD+ (Reduction of Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation) programs implementation and conservation planning.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available