4.2 Article

Glycemic control and use of A1c in primary care patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus

Journal

PRIMARY CARE DIABETES
Volume 9, Issue 5, Pages 385-391

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.pcd.2015.01.006

Keywords

Glycated hemoglobin; Primary healthcare; Type 2 diabetes

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Aims: To evaluate the degree of glycemic control and its relationship with disease characteristics and antidiabetic treatment in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM), as well as the frequency of A1c use. Methods: For this purpose, an observational, cross-sectorial, and multicenter study was performed. A total of 443 patients were monitored in 17 Spanish primary healthcare centers. Demographic and clinical variables were recorded from the clinical history of patients. Results: Mean age was 68.9 +/- 12.0 years. Time of evolution of DM was 9.2 +/- 6.4 years. Mean A1c was 7.38 +/- 1.34% and 45% of patients achieved A1c <7%. There was a no significant relationship between the degree of control and time of evolution of DM. In 16% of patients no A1c determination was performed in the previous twelve months. In those patients in whom A1c was determined, 95% received pharmacologic treatment, and 31% insulin therapy. 66% of patients on monotherapy attained A1C <7%, compared with 39% and 23% of those receiving double- and triple-oral therapy, respectively (p <0.001). Only 21% of patients on insulin therapy achieved A1c <7%. The worst-controlled patients were those receiving oral antidiabetic agents and insulin (24% had A1c levels >= 9%). Conclusions: A large proportion of patients are poorly controlled. Poor control increases according to complexity of treatment. A1c is underdetermined in many patients, likely related to clinical inertia. (C) 2015 Primary Care Diabetes Europe. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available