4.1 Review

Diagnosis of visceral leishmaniasis

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.trstmh.2010.09.006

Keywords

Visceral leishmaniasis; Diagnosis; rK39; Polymerase chain reaction; Sensitivity; Specificity

Funding

  1. NIAID, NIH [1P50AI074321-01]
  2. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ALLERGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASES [P50AI074321] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Leishmaniasis is a vector-borne disease with up to 350 million people at risk of infection worldwide. Among its different clinical manifestations, visceral is the most severe form. Since clinical features of visceral leishmaniasis (VL) mimic several other common diseases, accurate diagnosis is crucial as the treatment is associated with significant toxicity. Invasive and risky techniques involving demonstration of the parasites in stained preparations from splenic and bone marrow aspirate is still the gold standard for VL diagnosis. Serological tests using rK39 in ELISA or rapid immunochromatographic format, Direct Agglutination Test (DAT), immunoblotting have issues related to a significant proportion of asymptomatic individuals being positive with these tests and their inability to diagnose relapses as these remain positive for several months to years after cure. PCR is the most common molecular technique successfully used for diagnosis and differentiation of species. Through this review we focus extensively on the comparative utilities of the various diagnostic tools currently available for VL describing in depth their advantages and disadvantages, addressing the recent advances attained in the field. A simple, rapid, non invasive, accurate and cost effective marker of active VI_ which can be used in field conditions, is necessary to improve diagnosis of VL. (C) 2010 Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available