4.1 Article

Site Fidelity and Movement of Etheostoma fonticola with Implications to Endangered Species Management

Journal

TRANSACTIONS OF THE AMERICAN FISHERIES SOCIETY
Volume 142, Issue 4, Pages 1049-1057

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1080/00028487.2013.793612

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. USGS Quick Response program grant through the Columbia Environmental Research Center (CERC)
  2. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (US-FWS)
  3. Texas State University, Department of Biology (TxState)
  4. Texas State University-San Marcos [IACUC 0816_0331_17]
  5. Texas Parks and Wildlife Department [SPR-0390-045]
  6. USFWS Threatened and Endangered Species Permit [TE676811-2]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We quantified site fidelity, directionality and magnitude of movement, and factors associated with movement of the endangered Fountain Darter Etheostoma fonticola, a narrowly distributed (<11km of stream habitat) and small etheostomid, within a 200-m section of a spring-fed river on the Edwards Plateau of south-central Texas. Etheostoma fonticola exhibited high site fidelity, moving on average (1 SD) 10 +/- 17m during a 1-year period. Site fidelity was most notable in areas with low-growing aquatic vegetation (i.e., algae or Ricca fluitans). Movement was most often towards areas with low-growing aquatic vegetation (69%), more frequently in an upstream direction (81%), in winter and spring-summer seasons (>55%), and among larger fish (>30mm TL). Maximum distance moved was 95m within 26 d. Movement of E. fonticola was consistent with movement of narrowly distributed and slackwater etheostomids as well as widely distributed, swift-water etheostomids. As such, movement potential and maximum movement do not satisfactorily explain why some darters are more widely distributed than others. Collectively, etheostomids conform to the theory of restricted movements among resident stream fishes, but movement of large distances occurs and is probably necessary, even among species with high site fidelity. Received June 4, 2012; accepted April 3, 2013

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available