4.7 Article

Microstructural evolution during solution treatment of thixoformed AM60B Mg alloy

Journal

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/S1003-6326(11)60775-9

Keywords

AM60B Mg alloy; thixoforming; solution heat treatment; microstructure; kinetics

Funding

  1. National Basic Research Program of China [G2007CB613706]
  2. Lanzhou University of Technology, China
  3. Opening Foundation of State Key Laboratory of Advanced Nonferrous Materials, China [SKL03004]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The microstructural evolution and kinetic characteristics were studied during solution treatment of AM60B Mg alloy prepared by thixoforming. The results indicate that the microstructural evolution includes two stages: the first stage involves rapid dissolution of eutectic beta (Mg17Al12) phase, homogenization and coarsening, and the second stage is regarded as normal grain growth consisting of primary alpha-Mg particles (primary particles) and secondary alpha-Mg grains (secondary grains). In the first stage, the dissolution completes in a quite short time because the fine beta phase can quickly dissolve into the small-sized secondary grains. The homogenization of Al element needs relatively long time. Simultaneously, the microstructure morphology and average grain size obviously change. The first stage sustains approximately 1 h when it is solutionized at 395 degrees C. Comparatively, the second stage needs very long time and the microstructure evolves quite slowly as a result of low Al content gradient and thus low diffusivity of Al element after the homogenization of the first stage. The growth model of primary particles obeys power function while that of the secondary grains follows the traditional growth equation in the first stage. In the second stage, both of the primary particles and secondary grains behave a same model controlled by diffusion along grain boundaries and through crystal lattice.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available