4.7 Review

Application of modern sample preparation techniques to the determination of chloropropanols in food samples

Journal

TRAC-TRENDS IN ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY
Volume 62, Issue -, Pages 173-183

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.trac.2014.07.012

Keywords

Chloropropanol; Derivatization; Determination; Dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction (DLLME); Food contaminant; Food sample; Magnetic solid-phase extraction (MSPE); Pressurized liquid extraction (PLE); Sample preparation; Solid-phase microextraction (SPME)

Funding

  1. Polish National Centre for Research and Development [11/171/L-3/11/NCBR/2012]
  2. European Social Fund
  3. State Budget
  4. Pomorskie Voivodeship Budget

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Chloropropanols are heat-induced food toxicants that recently caused concern among industrial and scientific experts. World and European organizations related to food safety asked researchers to investigate mitigation strategies regarding these contaminants. The essential objective of this project was development of fast analytical methods enabling reliable determination and quantification of 3-monochloropropane1,2-diol, 2-monochloropropane-1,3-diol and 1,3-dichloropropanol. There are now several widely applied methods, which meet the requirements to some extent, but they involve a multi-step sample-preparation process, rather undesirable in routine analysis. The solution seems to be application of modern extraction techniques, especially combined with derivatization, which may lead to shortening and simplifying the whole procedure. We present the advantages of possible options for determination of chloropropanols by summarizing methods already developed involving techniques such as solid-phase microextraction, magnetic solid-phase extraction, pressurized liquid extraction or dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available