4.7 Review

An assessment of atmospheric-pressure solids-analysis probes for the detection of chemicals in food

Journal

TRAC-TRENDS IN ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY
Volume 29, Issue 11, Pages 1326-1335

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.trac.2010.08.004

Keywords

Adulterant; Ambient mass spectrometry; ASAP; Atmospheric-pressure solids-analysis probe; Direct analysis; Food analysis; Food contaminant; Food residue; Pesticide; Rapid detection

Funding

  1. European Commission
  2. UK Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The atmospheric-pressure solids-analysis probe (ASAP) is a relatively new technique with only a limited number of applications reported to date. Nevertheless, this direct-analysis technique has the potential to be employed in a wide range of analytical-chemistry scenarios, including the rapid detection of residues, contaminants and adulterants in food. We present data showing the benefits and the challenges associated with the use of ASAP to detect pesticides in cereals. Also shown are 'proof-of-principle' data for the detection of adulterants (e.g., illegal food dyes). One of the main challenges with ASAP relates to the sampling of heterogeneous matrices (e.g., food and field-test samples). Whilst ASAP can offer direct (i.e. without any sample preparation), qualitative screening analyses for chemical contaminants, the use of ASAP for quantification is more difficult, especially with regards to compliance with the latest European Union guidelines and legislation. At present, the ASAP system is not automated, but can still provide robust data within a few minutes. It is anticipated that in the future this type of technique could be employed in a number of targeted screening applications (e.g., the detection of banned pesticides and veterinary medicines at the farm, factory, border-inspection posts and other 'up-stream' food-control locations) Crown Copyright (C) 2010 Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available