4.4 Article

Snake venom glutaminyl cyclases: Purification, cloning, kinetic study, recombinant expression, and comparison with the human enzyme

Journal

TOXICON
Volume 86, Issue -, Pages 40-50

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.toxicon.2014.04.012

Keywords

Snake venom pyroglutaminyl modification; Cloning and sequencing; 3D models; Recombinant enzyme; Inhibition kinetics

Funding

  1. Academia Sinica
  2. National Science Council Taiwan, ROC [NSC 99-2311-B-001-016-MY3]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Among various snake venom components, glutaminyl cyclase (vQC) is one of the least understood protein family and none of its members has been purified or characterized. Here we confirmed the presence of vQC activity in a wide spectrum of venom species via enzymatic assay using a synthetic fluorogenic substrate. We have also cloned novel vQC cDNAs from seven species including Crotalus atrox. The results revealed more than 96% sequence similarities among vQCs and similar to 75% sequence identities between vQCs and human secretory QC (hQC). The vQC glycoprotein of 43 kDa was isolated from C atrox venom, and its N-terminal sequence was determined. The optimal pH range for vQC reaction was 7.5-8.0, and the enzymes were stable up to 50 degrees C. Similar to hQC, vQCs were substantially inactivated by 1 mM 1,10-phenanthroline but slightly affected by 20 mM EDTA, suggestive of a similar zinc-catalytic environment for these enzymes. Although their catalytic residues were highly conserved, vQCs were less susceptible to inhibition by synthetic imidazole derivatives which potently inhibited hQC. The 3D-models revealed that vQC and hQC structures display different surface charge distributions around the active sites, which might affect substrate and inhibitor binding affinities. The recombinant vQCs prepared from Escherichia colt displayed weaker substrate binding affinities relative to the native vQCs, possibly due to the lack of glycosylation. The present report offers new structural and functional insights into vQCs and sheds light on the specificity differences between vQCs and hQC. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available