4.2 Review

The NAD ratio redox paradox: why does too much reductive power cause oxidative stress?

Journal

TOXICOLOGY MECHANISMS AND METHODS
Volume 23, Issue 5, Pages 297-302

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.3109/15376516.2012.759305

Keywords

Diabetes; glucose; mitochondria; NADH; NADPH; oxidative stress

Categories

Funding

  1. Fundacao para a Ciencia e a Tecnologia [SFRH/BD/38467/2007]
  2. Fundacao para a Ciencia e Tecnologia, Portugal, under the frame of Programa Operacional Tematico Factores de Competitividade (COMPTE) do Quadro Comunitario de Apoio III [PTDC/QUI/72826/2006, PTCD/QUI-BIC/103514/2008]
  3. Fundo Comunitario Europeu (FEDER)
  4. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [SFRH/BD/38467/2007, PTDC/QUI/72826/2006] Funding Source: FCT

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The reductive power provided by nicotinamide adenine dinucleotides is invaluable for several cellular processes. It drives metabolic reactions, enzymatic activity, regulates genetic expression and allows for the maintenance of a normal cell redox status. Therefore, the balance between the oxidized (NAD(+)) and the reduced (NADH) forms is critical for the cell's proper function and ultimately, for its survival. Being intimately associated with the cells' metabolism, it is expected that alterations to the NAD(+)/NADH ratio are to be found in situations of metabolic diseases, as is the case of diabetes. NAD(+) is a necessary cofactor for several enzymes' activity, many of which are related to metabolism. Therefore, a decrease in the NAD(+)/NADH ratio causes these enzymes to decrease in activity (reductive stress), resulting in an altered metabolic situation that might be the first insult toward several pathologies, such as diabetes. Here, we review the importance of nicotinamide adenine dinucleotides in the liver cell and its fluctuations in a state of type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available