4.2 Article

Di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate-induced renal oxidative stress in rats and protective effect of selenium

Journal

TOXICOLOGY MECHANISMS AND METHODS
Volume 22, Issue 6, Pages 415-423

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.3109/15376516.2012.666652

Keywords

Di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate (DEHP); selenium deficiency (SeD); selenium supplementation (SeS); antioxidant enzymes; kidney; lipid peroxidation; oxidative stress

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study was designed to examine the oxidative stress potential of di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate (DEHP) on rat kidney and to evaluate possible protective effect of selenium (Se) status. Se deficiency (SeD) was produced in 3-week old Sprague-Dawley rats by feeding them <= 0.05 Se mg/kg diet for 5 weeks; Se supplementation group (SeS) was on 1 mg Se/kg diet. DEHP treated groups received 1000 mg/kg dose by gavage during the last 10 days of the feeding period. Activities of antioxidant selenoenzymes [glutathione peroxidase 1 (GPx1), glutathione peroxidase 4 (GPx4), thioredoxin reductase (TrxR)], catalase (CAT), superoxide dismutase (SOD), and glutathione S-transferase (GST); concentrations of total glutathione (GSH), thiols and thiobarbituric acid reactive substance (TBARS) levels were measured. DEHP treatment was found to induce oxidative stress in rat kidney, as evidenced by significant decreases in GPx1 (similar to 20%) and SOD (similar to 30%) activities and GSH levels (similar to 20%), along with marked decrease in thiol content (similar to 40%) and increase in TBARS (similar to 30%) levels. The effects of DEHP was more pronounced in SeD rats, whereas Se supplementation was protective by providing substantial elevations of GPx1 and GPx4 activities and GSH levels. These findings emphasized the critical role of Se as an effective redox regulator and the importance of Se status in protecting renal tissue from the oxidant stressor activity of DEHP.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available