4.5 Article

Effect of ozone exposure and infection on bronchoalveolar lavage: Sex differences in response patterns

Journal

TOXICOLOGY LETTERS
Volume 230, Issue 2, Pages 333-344

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.toxlet.2014.04.008

Keywords

Oxidative stress; Surfactant; SP-A; Pneumonia; Innate immunity

Categories

Funding

  1. NIH from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute [HL 34788, R01 ES009882]
  2. China Scholarship Council, Beijing, China
  3. National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences and Xiaozhuang Gan

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Female mice exhibit a better survival rate than males after infection, but if infection follows an ozone-induced oxidative stress, male survival exceeds that of females. Our goal was to study bronchoalveolar lavage factors that contribute to these sex differences in outcome. We studied parameters at 4, 24, and 48 h after ozone exposure and infection, including markers of inflammation, oxidative stress, and tissue damage, and surfactant phospholipids and surfactant protein A (SP-A). A multianalyte immunoassay at the 4 h time point measured 59 different cytokines, chemokines, and other proteins. We found that: (1) Although some parameters studied revealed sex differences, no sex differences were observed in LDH, total protein, MIP-2, and SP-A. Males showed more intragroup significant differences in SP-A between filtered air- and ozone-exposed mice compared to females. (2) Oxidized dimeric SP-A was higher in FA-exposed female mice. (3) Surfactant phospholipids were typically higher in males. (4) The multianalyte data revealed differences in the exuberance of responses under different conditions - males in response to infection and females in response to oxidative stress. These more exuberant, and presumably less well-controlled responses associate with the poorer survival. We postulate that the collective effects of these sex differences in response patterns of lung immune cells may contribute to the clinical outcomes previously observed. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available