4.5 Article

PCDD, PCDF, and PCB exposure in current and former firefighters from Eastern Siberia

Journal

TOXICOLOGY LETTERS
Volume 213, Issue 1, Pages 9-14

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.toxlet.2011.09.021

Keywords

Dioxins; PCDDs; PCDFs; Dioxin-like PCBs; Firefighters; Occupational exposure

Categories

Funding

  1. Russian Foundation for Basic Research [08-04-91119]
  2. U.S. Civilian Research & Development Foundation [RUB1-2917-AN-07]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The current study examines whether the occupation of firefighting contributes to exposure to polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins (PCDDs), polychlorinated dibenzofurans (PCDFs) and dioxin-like polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs). We compared serum dioxin concentrations and congener profiles of current firefighters (n = 13) with those of men who have ceased employment as firefighters (n = 17) and with men employed in occupations other than firefighter (n = 10). We found that compared to former or non-firefighters, current firefighters have higher levels of dioxins primarily due to the contribution of PCBs and to a lesser extent PCDFs. PCDFs were significantly higher in former firefighters compared to non-firefighters (p < 0.05). Comparisons with studies performed by other investigators suggest that local environmental conditions contribute to some of the elevation of PCBs. The congeners 1,2,3,4,6,7,8-heptachlorodibenzodioxin and PCB-114 were significantly higher in current firefighters when compared to former or non-firefighters. Moreover, levels of these congeners were inversely correlated with years since employed as firefighter (Spearman r = -0.610, p = 0.009 and Spearman r = -0.53, p = 0.03, respectively). The classes of dioxins show an overall decline with years since employed as firefighters, this decline is most evident with PCDDs (Spearman r = 0.46, p = 0.06). Together, the combination of evidence supports firefighting as a source of exposure to dioxins. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available