4.5 Article

Cytokine production by co-cultures exposed to monodisperse amorphous silica nanoparticles: The role of size and surface area

Journal

TOXICOLOGY LETTERS
Volume 211, Issue 2, Pages 98-104

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.toxlet.2012.03.002

Keywords

Amorphous silica; Nanoparticles; In vitro; Co-culture; Endothelium; Cytokines

Categories

Funding

  1. Belgian Science Policy program Science for a Sustainable Development [SD/HE/02A]
  2. Fonds voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek Vlaanderen' (FWO) [FWO G.0707.09]
  3. K.U. [3M110239]
  4. Flemish Government

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The aim of this study was to test the influence of nanoparticle size and surface area (SA) on cytokine secretion by co-cultures of pulmonary epithelial cells (A549), macrophages (differentiated THP-1 cells) and endothelium cells (EA.hy926) in a two-compartment system. We used monodisperse amorphous silica nanoparticles (2, 16, 60 and 104 nm) at concentrations of 51 mu g/cm(2) cell culture SA or 10 cm(2) particle SA/cm(2). A549 and THP-1 cells were exposed to nanoparticles for 24 h, in the presence of EA.hy926 cells cultured in an insert introduced above the bi-culture after 12 h. Supernatants from both compartments were recovered and TNF-alpha, IL-6, IL-8 and MIP-1 alpha were measured. Significant secretion of all cytokines was observed for the 2 nm particles at both concentrations and in both compartments. Larger particles of 60 nm induced significant cytokine secretion at the dose of 10 cm(2) particle SA/cm(2). The use of multiple cellular types showed that cytokine secretion in single cell cultures is amplified or mitigated in co-cultures. The release of pro-inflammatory mediators by endothelial cells not directly exposed to nanoparticles indicates a possible endothelium activation after inhalation of silica particles. This work shows the role of size and SA in cellular response to amorphous nanosilica. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available