4.5 Article

Biological monitoring for exposure to deltamethrin: A human oral dosing study and background levels in the UK general population

Journal

TOXICOLOGY LETTERS
Volume 213, Issue 1, Pages 35-38

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.toxlet.2011.04.014

Keywords

Biological monitoring; Deltamethrin; Human volunteer study; General population; Urine; Synthetic pyrethroid

Categories

Funding

  1. UK Food Standards Agency
  2. CEFIC (European Chemical Industries Association)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

An oral dose of the pyrethroid insecticide deltamethrin was administered to five volunteers at the acceptable daily intake (ADI, 0.01 mg/kg). Total urine was collected from the volunteers at timed intervals for 60 h post-exposure. The metabolites 3-(2,2-dibromovinyl)-2,2-dimethyl-(1-cyclopropane)carboxylic acid (DBVA) and 3-phenoxybenzoic acid (3-PBA) were quantified in hydrolysed urine using GC-MS analysis. Both metabolites exhibited rapid elimination half-lives of 3.6 and 7.1 h, respectively. Levels of DBVA quantified in urine were approximately 5 times greater than 3-PEA. Mean metabolite levels found in 24 h total urine collections, normalised for a 70 kg individual, were 42.8 mu mol DBVA/mol creatinine (range 34.6-63.2; CV = 28%) and 8.7 mu mol 3-PBA/mol creatinine (range 6.6-12.7; CV = 31%). We calculate that a 70 kg person receiving a dose of deltamethrin at the ADI would be expected to have a 24-h total urine collection level of 32-53 mu mol DBVA/mol creatinine (95% confidence interval). Analysis of 336 samples from adult UK residents with no known exposure to deltamethrin derives an upper reference value (95th percentile) of 0.5 mu mol DBVA/mol creatinine (maximum 4.2 mu mol DBVA/mol creatinine), demonstrating that general population exposure to deltamethrin in the UK is very low and well within levels expected at the ADI. Crown Copyright (C) 2011 Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available