4.5 Article

A chronic oral exposure of pigs with deoxynivalenol partially prevents the acute effects of lipopolysaccharides on hepatic histopathology and blood clinical chemistry

Journal

TOXICOLOGY LETTERS
Volume 215, Issue 3, Pages 193-200

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.toxlet.2012.10.009

Keywords

Deoxynivalenol; Escherichia coli lipopolysaccharide; Porcine liver; Histopathology; Blood chemistry

Categories

Funding

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) [DA 558/1-3, RO 743/3-2]
  2. European Union (FP 7 INTERPLAY) [227549]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Lipopolysaccharides (LPS), a cell wall component of gram-negative bacteria, and deoxynivalenol (DON), a prevalent Fusarium-derived contaminant of cereal grains, are each reported to have detrimental effects on the liver. A potentiating toxic effect of the combined exposure was reported previously in a mouse model and hepatocytes in vitro, but not in swine as the most DON-susceptible species. Thus, pigs were fed either a control diet (CON) or a Fusarium contaminated diet (DON, 3.1 mg DON/kg diet) for 37 days. At day 37 control pigs were infused for 1 h either with physiological saline (CON_CON), 100 mu g/kg BW DON (CON_DON), 7.5 mu g/kg BW LPS (CON_LPS), or both toxins (CON_DON/LPS) and Fusarium-pigs with saline (DON_CON) or 7.5 mu g/kg BW LPS (DON_LPS). Blood samples were taken before and after infusion (-30, +30, +60, +120, and +180 min) for clinical blood chemistry. Pigs were sacrificed at +195 min and liver histopathology was performed. LPS resulted in higher relative liver weight (p < 0.05), portal, periportal and acinar inflammation (p < 0.05), haemorrhage (p < 0.01) and pathological bilirubin levels (CON_CON 1.0 mu mol/L vs. CON_LPS 5.4 mu mol/L, CON_DON/LPS 8.3 mu mol/L; p < 0.001). DON feeding alleviated effects of LPS infusion on histopathology and blood chemistry to control levels, whereas DON infusion alone had no impact. (c) 2012 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available