4.5 Article

The effect of dietary polyphenols on the epigenetic regulation of gene expression in MCF7 breast cancer cells

Journal

TOXICOLOGY LETTERS
Volume 192, Issue 2, Pages 119-125

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.toxlet.2009.10.010

Keywords

Chemoprevention; DNA methylation; Epigenetics; Histone methylation; Polyphenols

Categories

Funding

  1. Polish Ministry of Science and Higher Education [N405 048 31/3338]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The CpG island methylator phenotype is characterized by DNA hypermethylation in the promoters of several suppressor genes associated with the inactivation of various pathways involved in tumorigenesis. DNA methylation is catalyzed by specific DNA methyltransferases (DNMTs). Dietary phytochemicals particularly catechol-containing polyphenols were shown to inhibit these enzymes and reactivate epigenetically silenced genes. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of a wide range of dietary phytochemicals on the activity and expression of DNMTs in human breast cancer MCF7 cell line and their effect on DNA and histone H3 methylation. All phytochemicals inhibited the DNA methyltransferase activity with betanin being the weakest while rosmarinic and ellagic acids were the most potent modulators (up to 88% inhibition). While decitabine led to a partial demethylation and reactivation of the genes, none of the tested phytochemicals affected the methylation pattern or the expression of RASSF1A, GSTP1 or HIN1 in MCF7 cells. The global methylation of histone H3 was not affected by any of the tested phytochemicals or decitabine. The results of our study may suggest that non-nucleoside agents are not likely to be effective epigenetic modulators, in our experimental model at least. However, a long-term exposure to these chemicals in diet might potentially lead to an effect, which can be sufficient for cancer chemoprevention. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available