4.5 Article

The clock genes period 1 and period 2 mediate diurnal rhythms in dioxin-induced Cyp1A1 expression in the mouse mammary gland and liver

Journal

TOXICOLOGY LETTERS
Volume 196, Issue 1, Pages 28-32

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.toxlet.2010.03.020

Keywords

Circadian clock; PAS genes; Xenobiotics; Aryl hydrocarbon receptor; AhR nuclear translocator; Cytochrome p450 enzymes

Categories

Funding

  1. NIH [P01 NS39546]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Transcription factors expressing Per-Arnt-Sim (PAS) domains are key components of the mammalian circadian clockworks found in most cells and tissues. Because these transcription factors interact with other PAS genes mediating xenobiotic metabolism and because toxin responses are often marked by daily variation, we determined whether the toxin-mediated activation of the signaling pathway involving several PAS genes, the aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR) and AhR nuclear translocator (ARNT), fluctuates rhythmically and whether this diurnal oscillation is affected by targeted disruption of key PAS genes in the circadian clockworks. Period 1 (Per1) and Per2. Treatment with the prototypical Ahr ligand, 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD), had inductive effects on a key target of AhR signaling, Cyp1A1, in both the mammary gland and liver of all animals. In wild type mice, the amplitude of this TCDD-induced Cyp1A1 expression in the mammary gland and liver was significantly greater (23-43-fold) during the night than during the daytime. However, the diurnal variation in the TCDD induction of mammary gland and liver Cypl Al expression was abolished in Per1(ldc), Per2(ldc) and Per(ldc)/Per2(ldc) mutant mice, suggesting that Perl, Per2 and their timekeeping function in the circadian clockworks mediate the diurnal modulation of AhR-regulated responses to TCDD in the mammary gland and liver. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available