4.5 Article

Studies on the in vitro genotoxicity of baytubes®, agglomerates of engineered multi-walled carbon-nanotubes (MWCNT)

Journal

TOXICOLOGY LETTERS
Volume 186, Issue 3, Pages 160-165

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.toxlet.2008.11.024

Keywords

Nanoparticles; Agglomerates; In vitro genotoxicity; MWCNT; Carbon-nanotubes

Categories

Funding

  1. Bayer Material Science AG

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The increasing production and expanding application of nanoparticles in multiple aspects off life necessitate reliable safety assessment. In this context we here report on the evaluation of the potential genotoxicity of baytubes (R), i.e. agglomerates of multi-walled carbon-nanotubes (MWCNT). Testing for chromosome aberrations was done in V79 cells and for gene mutations in the Salmonella microsome test. Baytubes (R) were formulated in deionised water at 10 mg/ml and treated with ultrasound for 30 min at 25 C. Particle size distribution was determined under the incubation conditions in the in vitro studies. In the chromosome aberration test V79 cells (OECD TG 473) were exposed in the absence or presence of S9 mix for 4 h to concentrations of 2.5, 5 and 10 mu g/ml of baytubes (R) (visible from concentration of 5 mu g/ml and higher). Harvest was 18 h after the beginning of the treatment. In addition, cells treated with 10 mu g/ml were harvested 30 h after the beginning of the treatment. An additional experiment was performed using continuous treatment at 2.5, 5 and 10 mu g/ml for 18 h (no S9 mix) with subsequent harvest. Under these conditions and in the concentration range tested there were no cytotoxic and no clastogenic effects. In the Salmonella microsome (Ames) test (OECD TG 471) concentrations up to 5000 mu g/plate were tested in Salmonella typhimurium (strains TA 1535, TA 100, TA 1537, TA 98 and TA 102) in the absence or presence of S9 mix. Under these conditions and in the concentration range tested there were no bacteriotoxic and no mutagenic effects. (C) 2008 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available