4.5 Article

The expression of nerve growth factor in mice lung following low-level toluene exposure

Journal

TOXICOLOGY LETTERS
Volume 191, Issue 2-3, Pages 240-245

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.toxlet.2009.09.004

Keywords

Toluene; Allergy; Mice; Lung; Nerve growth factor

Categories

Funding

  1. Ministry of the Environment
  2. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology [18390189, 21390198]
  3. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [18390189] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

To clarify the effect of indoor air pollutants on nerve growth factor (NGF) production in lung, male C3H/HeN mice were exposed to filtered air (control) or toluene at levels of 0.9 ppm, 9 ppm, or 90 ppm for 30 min via nose-only inhalation on days 0, 1, 2, 7, 14, 21, 28, 35, 42, 49 and 56 As an allergic mouse model, some mice (n = 24) were immunized with ovalbumin. Lungs from each mouse were collected to determine NGF and related receptor expressions using real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) analysis. NGF and TrkA mRNAs were increased in the lungs of the immunized mice following exposure to 9 ppm toluene (n = 6) (P < 0.05 ppm vs. 0 ppm) Remarkably increased NGF-positive bronchiolus and alveolar epithelium cells were observed in 9 ppm toluene-exposed, immunized mice. To determine NGF mediating signaling, we also examined mRNA expression of neurotrophin receptor p75 (p75(NTR)) and oxidative stress marker, heme oxygenase (HO)-1 in the lung. There is no difference in the expressions of p75(NTR) and HO-1 between toluene-exposed and control mice. The expression of CCL2 and CCL3 mRNAs was significantly elevated in 9 ppm toluene-exposed, immunized mice. These findings suggest that the exposure with volatile organic compounds enhanced NGF expression and airway inflammation stronger in allergic individuals than in healthy individuals. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available