4.5 Editorial Material

Cytotoxic and genotoxic effects of matrices for cartilage tissue engineering

Journal

TOXICOLOGY LETTERS
Volume 190, Issue 2, Pages 128-133

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.toxlet.2009.06.880

Keywords

Polycaprolactone; Comet assay; Cytotoxicity; Genotoxicity; Cartilage tissue engineering

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Customizing auricles with biodegradable polyurethane colonized with autologous chondrocytes as an approach for tissue engineering cartilage transplants has been suggested for the reconstruction of the external ear to repair auricular deformities. Dextrose, triethanolamine and poly(ethylene glycol)block-poly(propylene glycol)-block-poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG-PPG-PEG) are matrices of an open-pored polyurethane three-dimensional scaffold. After release from the polymer, these compounds can be absorbed into the human organism. Therefore, cytotoxic effects on human chondrocytes and lymphocytes and genotoxic effects on human lymphocytes were determined. Propidium iodide and fluoresceine diacetate staining as well as quantitative proliferations testing with EZ4U served to detect cytotoxic effects on chondrocytes. In lymphocytes cytotoxicity was checked by trypan blue staining and the alkaline single cell microgel electrophoresis (Comet) assay was used to study genotoxic effects. Dose-dependent cytotoxicity and genotoxicity of the matrices could be shown. Concentrations up to 4.25 mg/ml for dextrose, 0.15 mg/ml for PEG-PPG-PEG and 0.9 mg/ml for triethanolamine did not show cytotoxic effects in chondrocytes or genotoxic effects in lymphocytes. These data suggest that dextrose, triethanolamine and PEG-PPG-PEG could be safely used if scaffolds made of open-pored polyurethane do not release these compounds at a rate giving higher concentrations at the site of implantation or in body fluids, respectively. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available