4.5 Article

In silico predication of nuclear hormone receptors for organic pollutants by homology modeling and molecular docking

Journal

TOXICOLOGY LETTERS
Volume 191, Issue 1, Pages 69-73

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.toxlet.2009.08.005

Keywords

Nuclear hormone receptors; Homology modeling; Molecular docking; Organic pollutants

Categories

Funding

  1. Jiangsu Department of Science and Technology [BE200970536]
  2. Nanjing University Innovative Foundation [2006071009]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Homology modeling and molecular docking were used to in silica predict the rat nuclear hormone receptors of different organic pollutants. Rat aryl hydrocarbon receptor (rAhR), constitutive androstane receptor (rCAR) and pregnane X receptor (rPXR) were chosen as the target nuclear receptors. 3D models of ligand binding domains of rAhR, rCAR and rPXR were constructed by MODELLER 9V6 and assessed by the Procheck and Prosa 2003. Surflex-Dock program was applied to bind the different organic pollutants into the three receptors to predict their affinities. The results of docking experiments demonstrated that three polybrominated dibenzofurans (PBDFs, including TretaBDF, PentaBDF wand HexaBDF) and 3.3',4,4',5'-pentachlorobiphenyl (PCB126) would be better categorized by rAhR-dependent mechanism, but four polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs, including BDE47, BDE80, BDE99 and BDE153) and 2,2',4,4',5,5'-hexachlorobiphenyl (PCB153) by rCARand rPXR-dependent mechanism. For benzo(a)pyrene and pyrene, they have high affinities with the three target receptors, which suggests that crosstalk among the receptors might occur during the receptor induction. The results of this study are consistent with those of animal experiments reported by previous literatures, which suggest that homology modeling and molecular docking would have the potential to predict the nuclear hormone receptors of environmental pollutants. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available