4.5 Article

Cytotoxicity of ginkgolic acid in HepG2 cells and primary rat hepatocytes

Journal

TOXICOLOGY LETTERS
Volume 187, Issue 3, Pages 131-136

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.toxlet.2009.02.012

Keywords

Ginkgolic acid; Rat hepatocyte; HepG2 cell; CYP inhibition; CYP induction; MTT; Cytotoxicity

Categories

Funding

  1. Key Scientific and Technical Foundation of Zhejiang [2005C13026]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Ginkgolic acids and related alkylphenols (e.g. cardanols and cardols) have been recognized as hazardous compounds with suspected cytotoxic, allergenic, mutagenic and carcinogenic properties. To determine whether the phase I metabolism could contribute to their cytotoxicity, we investigated the cytotoxicity of one model compound, ginkgolic acid (15:1), using in vitro bioassay systems. In the first step, cytochrome P450 enzymes involved in ginkgolic acid metabolism were investigated in rat liver microsomes: then, two in vitro cell-based assay systems, primary rat hepatocytes and HepG2 cells, were used to study and the measurement of MTT reduction was used to assess cell viability. Results indicated that the cytotoxicity of ginkgolic acid in primary rat hepatocytes was lower than in HepG2 cells. Ginkgolic acid was demonstrated less cytotoxicity in four-day-cultured primary rat hepatocytes than in 20-h cultured ones. Co-incubation with selective CYP inhibitors, alpha-naphthoflavone and ketoconazole, could decrease the cytotoxicity of ginkgolic acid in primary rat hepatocytes. In agreement, pretreatment with selective CYP inducers, beta-naphthoflavone and rifampin, could increase the cytotoxicity of ginkgolic acid in HepG2 cells. These findings suggest that HepG2 cells were more sensitive to the cytotoxicity of ginkgolic acid than primary rat hepatocytes, and CYP1A and CYP3A could metabolize ginkgolic acid to more toxic compounds. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available