4.5 Article

Cellular responses induced by silver nanoparticles:: In vitro studies

Journal

TOXICOLOGY LETTERS
Volume 179, Issue 2, Pages 93-100

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.toxlet.2008.04.009

Keywords

silver nanoparticles; oxidative stress; apoptosis; A431; Ht-1080

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A systematic study on the in vitro interactions of 7-20 nm spherical silver nanoparticles (SNP) with HT-1080 and A431 cells was undertaken as a part of an on-going program in our laboratory to develop a topical antimicrobial agent for the treatment of burn wound infections. Upon exposure to SNP (up to 6.25 mu g/mL), morphology of both the cell types remained unaltered. However, at higher concentrations (6.25-50 mu g/mL) cells became less polyhedral, more fusiform, shrunken and rounded. IC50 values for HT-1080 and A431 as revealed by XTT assay were 10.6 and 11.6 mu g/mL, respectively. When the cells were challenged with similar to 1/2 IC50 concentration of SNP (6.25 mu g/mL), clear signs of oxidative stress, i.e. decreased GSH (similar to 2.5-folds in HT-1080, similar to 2-folds in A431) and SOD (similar to 1.6-folds in HT-1080, 3-folds in A431) as well as increased lipid peroxidation (similar to 2.5-folds in HT-1080, similar to 2-folds in A431) were seen. Changes in the levels of catalase and GPx in A431 cells were statistically insignificant in both cell types. DNA fragmentation in SNP-exposed cells suggested apoptosis. When the apoptotic thresholds of SNP were monitored with caspase-3 assay the concentrations required for the onset of apoptosis were found to be much lower (0.78 mu g/mL in HT-1080, 1.56 mu g/mL in A431) than the necrotic concentration (12.5 mu g/ml, in both cell types). These results can be used to define a safe range of SNP for the intended application as a topical antimicrobial agent after appropriate in vivo studies. (C) 2008 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available