4.5 Article

Selective iNOS inhibition reduces renal damage induced by cisplatin

Journal

TOXICOLOGY LETTERS
Volume 176, Issue 1, Pages 48-57

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.toxlet.2007.10.006

Keywords

cisplatin; 1400W; inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS); nitric oxide (NO degrees)

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Cisplatin is a chemotherapeutic agent used in the treatment of several cancer tumors; however, nephrotoxicity has restricted its use. Reactive oxygen species and peroxynitrite, which is formed by the reaction between superoxide anion and nitric oxide (NO degrees), are implicated in cisplatin-induced nephrotoxicity. In contrast, both toxic and beneficial effects of NO degrees have been suggested in cisplatin-induced nephrotoxicity. Therefore, nowadays the role of NO degrees in this experimental model remains controversial. The aim of the present work was to elucidate the role of NO degrees in cisplatin-induced renal damage using N-[3-(aminomethyl)benzyl]acetamidine (1400W), a selective and irreversible inhibitor of iNOS. The mRNA levels of iNOS were increased in cisplatin-treated rats. The administration of 1400W reduced the cisplatin induced histological damage, renal dysfunction (increase in proteinuria and kidney injury molecule expression and decrease in creatinine clearance), tubulointerstitial infiltration, oxidative stress (increase in renal malondialdehyde and inmunostaining for 4-hydroxy-2-nonenal) and nitrosative stress (immunostaining for 3-nitrotyrosine). In addition, the administration of 1400W was unable to modify systolic blood pressure in control rats. Our data demonstrate that selective iNOS inhibition reduces the cisplatin-induced nephrotoxicity and nitrosative stress which strongly suggest that in this experimental model (1) the NO degrees production is toxic and (2) iNOS is the main source of NO degrees. (c) 2007 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available