4.6 Review

The REporting of studies Conducted using Observational Routinely-collected health Data (RECORD) Statement

Journal

PLOS MEDICINE
Volume 12, Issue 10, Pages -

Publisher

PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001885

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Canadian Institutes of Health Research [130512]
  2. Swiss National Science Foundation [IZ32Z0_147388 / 1]
  3. Aarhus University Department of Clinical Epidemiology
  4. MRC [MR/J00488X/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  5. Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF) [IZ32Z0_147388] Funding Source: Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF)
  6. Cancer Research UK [16895] Funding Source: researchfish
  7. Lundbeck Foundation [R155-2014-2647] Funding Source: researchfish
  8. Medical Research Council [MR/J00488X/1, MR/K006584/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  9. National Institute for Health Research [NIHR/CS/010/014, NF-SI-0510-10090] Funding Source: researchfish
  10. Novo Nordisk Fonden [NNF14SA0015794] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Routinely collected health data, obtained for administrative and clinical purposes without specific a priori research goals, are increasingly used for research. The rapid evolution and availability of these data have revealed issues not addressed by existing reporting guidelines, such as Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE). The REporting of studies Conducted using Observational Routinely collected health Data (RECORD) statement was created to fill these gaps. RECORD was created as an extension to the STROBE statement to address reporting items specific to observational studies using routinely collected health data. RECORD consists of a checklist of 13 items related to the title, abstract, introduction, methods, results, and discussion section of articles, and other information required for inclusion in such research reports. This document contains the checklist and explanatory and elaboration information to enhance the use of the checklist. Examples of good reporting for each RECORD checklist item are also included herein. This document, as well as the accompanying website and message board (http://www.record-statement.org), will enhance the implementation and understanding of RECORD. Through implementation of RECORD, authors, journals editors, and peer reviewers can encourage transparency of research reporting.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available