4.5 Article

Inhibition of monoamine oxidase (MAO) by β-carbolines and their interactions in live neuronal (PC12) and liver (HuH-7 and MH1C1) cells

Journal

TOXICOLOGY IN VITRO
Volume 28, Issue 3, Pages 403-410

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.tiv.2013.12.006

Keywords

Combination index; Botanical; Harmine; Harmaline; Methylene blue; Cell assay

Categories

Funding

  1. appointment to the Research Participation Program at the U.S. Food and Drug Administration
  2. U.S. Food and Drug Administration

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Interactions among monoamine oxidase (MAO) inhibitors in drugs, botanicals, and dietary supplements may lead to unpredictable neurochemical dysfunction due to excessive inhibition or therapeutic invalidation. Often recombinant MAO or brain tissue homogenates have been used to evaluate MAO inhibitors such as the beta-carboline alkaloids (harmane, harmine, harmaline, and harmalol). However, there is a lack of cellular systems for evaluation of MAO activity, which represents a more advanced in vitro model compared to recombinant enzymes or tissue lysates. Using kynuramine assays, intracellular MAO inhibition by beta-carbolines was measured in PC12 (rat pheochromocytoma), MH1C1 (rat liver), and HuH-7 (human liver) cell lines, which were compared with human recombinant MAO and cell lysates. beta-Carbolines (1 mu M, 90 min incubations) inhibited MAO by 40-99% in live PC12 cells where MAO A was the active isoform, and <12% in HuH-7 and MH1C1 cells where MAO B was primarily active. The combination index (CI), which serves as a quantitative indicator of pharmacological interactions, was determined for harmaline/harmine (CI, 1.01-1.25) and methylene blue/harmine (CI, 0.74-1.07) in PC12 cells. Overall, this study illustrates applications of cell-based in vitro assay platforms to gain a comprehensive understanding of intracellular MAO inhibitors and their interactions. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available