4.5 Article

In vitro cytotoxicity of hydrothermally synthesized ZnO nanoparticles on human periodontal ligament fibroblast and mouse dermal fibroblast cells

Journal

TOXICOLOGY IN VITRO
Volume 28, Issue 8, Pages 1349-1358

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.tiv.2014.06.016

Keywords

Nanoparticles; Toxicity; Zinc oxide; Impedance measurement; Periodontal ligament fibroblasts; Dermal fibroblasts

Categories

Funding

  1. Turkish Academy of Sciences, TUBA (Ankara, Turkey)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The use of metal oxide nanopartides (NPs) in industrial applications has been expanding, as a consequence, risk of human exposure increases. In this study, the potential toxic effects of zinc oxide (ZnO) NPs on human periodontal ligament fibroblast cells (hPDLFs) and on mouse dermal fibroblast cells (mDFs) were evaluated in vitro. We synthesized ZnO NPs (particle size; 7-8 nm) by the hydrothermal method. Characterization assays were performed with atomic force microscopy, Braun-Emmet-Teller analysis, and dynamic light scattering. The hPDLFs and mDFs were incubated with the NPs with concentrations of 0.1, 1, 10, 50 and 100 mu g/mL for 6, 24 and 48 h. Under the control and NP-exposed conditions, we have made different types of measurements for cell viability and morphology, membrane leakage and intracellular reactive oxygen species generation. Also, we monitored cell responses to ZnO NPs using an impedance measurement system in real-time. While the morphological changes were visualized using scanning electron microscopy, the subcellular localization of NPs was investigated by transmission electron microscopy. Results indicated that ZnO NPs have significant toxic effects on both of the primary fibroblastic cells at concentrations of similar to 50-100 mu g/mL. The cytotoxicity of ZnO NPs on fibroblasts depended on concentration and duration of exposure. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available