4.5 Article

The in vitro cytotoxicity and genotoxicity of cigarette smoke particulate matter with reduced toxicant yields

Journal

TOXICOLOGY IN VITRO
Volume 27, Issue 5, Pages 1533-1541

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.tiv.2013.03.005

Keywords

Genotoxicity; Cytotoxicity; In vitro; Tobacco smoke; Particulate matter; Tobacco sheet substitute; Blend-treated tobacco; Toxicant

Categories

Funding

  1. BAT

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Tobacco smoke contains more than 5600 constituents, of which approximately 150 are toxicants. This paper describes the activities in the Neutral Red uptake (NRU) assay, the Salmonella mutagenicity test (SAL), the mouse lymphoma mammalian cell mutation assay (MLA) and the in vitro micronucleus test (IVMNT) of Particulate Matter (PM) obtained from experimental cigarettes (ECs), designed to produce reduced levels of toxicants. The designs included tobacco substitute sheet (TSS) containing glycerol, which dilutes toxicants in smoke, or the incorporation of blend-treated (BT) tobacco to reduce the levels of nitrogenous toxicant precursors and some polyphenols. All samples were cytotoxic in the NRU, however TSS reduced PM cytotoxicity in this assay. All PMs were mutagenic in the SAL, MLA and IVMNT. Reductions in bacterial mutagenicity were observed in the SAL, for cigarettes with BT tobacco, compared with their respective controls. The quantitative changes in bacterial mutagenicity could be explained by analytical chemistry data on smoke generated from the ECs used in the study. These observations, and the absence of consistent qualitative differences in the activities of the experimental, control and reference cigarettes, suggest that reduced toxicity cigarettes, as measured by the tests described in this paper, may be developed without introducing any additional cytotoxic or genotoxic hazards, but the impact of this on human health risks remains unknown. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available