4.5 Article

Oxidative stress responses to carboxylic acid functionalized single wall carbon nanotubes on the human intestinal cell line Caco-2

Journal

TOXICOLOGY IN VITRO
Volume 26, Issue 5, Pages 672-677

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.tiv.2012.03.007

Keywords

Caco-2; Carbon nanotubes; Nanoparticles; Oxidative stress; Toxicity

Categories

Funding

  1. Consejeria de Salud de la Junta de Andalucia [IP00192-2007]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Carbon nanotubes (CNT) are among the more promising nanomaterials due to their potential applications. In this sense, the adverse effects that CNT can induce are of concern. In particular, carboxylic acid functionalized single wall carbon nanotubes (COOH-SWCNT) have shown to reduce cell viability and induce morphological effects on the human intestinal cell line Caco-2, but little is known about the toxic mechanisms involved. The aim of the present study was to investigate the oxidative stress responses of this cell line after 24 h exposure to COOH-SWCNT. Biomarkers assayed included lipid peroxidation (LPO), reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation, and enzymatic and non-enzymatic antioxidant defences. Results showed an increase in ROS from 100 mu g/mL reaching 5.2-fold the basal value at the highest concentration assayed. An induction of catalase, superoxide dismutase and glutathione peroxidase activities was also observed, meanwhile glutathione reductase showed a reduced activity at 1000 mu g/mL. Glutathione (GSH) levels also decreased (2.5-fold) at the highest level of exposure. Therefore, the antioxidant defences could not overwhelm the oxidative insult caused by COOH-SWCNT and LPO products increased in a concentration-dependent manner. We can conclude that oxidative stress plays a role in the pathogenicity induced by COOH-SWCNT on Caco-2 cells at the concentrations assayed. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available