4.5 Article

Effects of sub-toxic Cadmium concentrations on bone gene expression program: Results of an in vitro study

Journal

TOXICOLOGY IN VITRO
Volume 24, Issue 6, Pages 1670-1680

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.tiv.2010.05.020

Keywords

Cadmium; Osteoblasts; Osteoblast markers; Extracellular matrix; Gene expression

Categories

Funding

  1. Basic Research University of Perugia
  2. INAIL - Direzione Regionale Umbria

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Since occupational and environmental exposure to the heavy metal Cadmium (Cd) affects human health this study investigated the effects of exposure to a single, or multiple, sub-toxic Cd concentrations on sub-confluent and confluent human osteoblast growth and expression of specific bone differentiation markers. RT-PCR quantified gene expression of type I collagen, metalloprotease (MMP13), runt-related transcription factor-2 (RUNX2), osterix, osteocalcin, osteonectin, alkaline phosphatase, integrins and bone sialoprotein (BSP). Expression of fibroblast growth factors 1 and 2 (FGF1, FGF2), transforming growth factor-beta(3) (TGF beta(3)) and bone morphogenetic protein-2 (BMP2) were also evaluated to determine whether Cd-related effects were mediated by an imbalance in expression. Depending on osteoblast concentration and maturation stages, Cd inhibited or stimulated cell growth, decreased type I collagen, increased MMP13. FGF1 and BMP2 gene expression and stimulated the mineralization process only in continuously exposed cultures. These results suggest that in vivo, acute or chronic exposure to sub-toxic Cd concentrations may affect bone formation differently and support the hypothesis that Cd-induced bone disorders may involve downstream changes in growth factor expression. The results are of interest in forensic and occupational medicine in establishing preventive measures to reduce professional exposure risks. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available