4.5 Article

Cigarette smoke total particulate matter increases mucous secreting cell numbers in vitro: A potential model of goblet cell hyperplasia

Journal

TOXICOLOGY IN VITRO
Volume 24, Issue 3, Pages 981-987

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.tiv.2009.12.019

Keywords

Cigarette smoke; Human bronchial epithelial cells; MUC5AC

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Cigarette smoking is associated with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) - a term encompassing chronic lung inflammation, chronic bronchitis and emphysema. Goblet cell hyperplasia is a characteristic feature of the lung epithelium in COPD patients contributing to the overproduction of airway mucus, including mucin MUC5AC. Using an in vitro model of differentiated lung epithelium we have investigated morphological and cellular changes in response to interleukin (IL)-13 (2.5-20 ng/ml), cigarette smoke total particulate matter (TPM; 0.31-20 mu g/ml) and three mainstream cigarette smoke constituents: acrolein, formaldehyde and acetaldehyde (all at 0.001-1 mu M) over 28 days during differentiation (agents replaced daily Monday-Friday). Control cultures of human bronchial epithelial cells (HBECs) underwent mucociliary differentiation producing a columnar epithelium containing goblet, ciliated and basal cells. Non-cytotoxic doses of IL-13 induced a significant increase in the percentage of MUC5AC positive cells. Using both flow cytometry and immunocytochemical techniques for identification of MUC5AC positive cells, TPM treatment induced an increase in MUC5AC positive cells, becoming maximal at 5 mu g/ml. Acrolein treatment also increased the percentage of MUC5AC positive cells. However, formaldehyde or acetaldehyde had little effect. This study demonstrates that lung toxicants can induce a profound effect on cellular differentiation in an in vitro model of the human lung epithelium. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available