4.5 Article

Reconstruction of three-dimensional human skin model composed of dendritic cells, keratinocytes and fibroblasts utilizing a handy scaffold of collagen vitrigel membrane

Journal

TOXICOLOGY IN VITRO
Volume 23, Issue 2, Pages 333-337

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.tiv.2008.12.003

Keywords

Three-dimensional human skin model; Collagen vitrigel membrane; Dendritic cells; Skin sensitization; CD86

Categories

Funding

  1. Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research in Japan

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We previously we attempted to make a three-dimensional human skin model consisting of three different cells, dendritic cells, keratinocytes and fibroblasts (KDF-Skin) to evaluate immunoreactions in human skin; however, this model had various problems; for example (1) the incubation period for the construction of this model is long (about three weeks); (2) to construct the collagen gel, high amounts of fibroblasts are needed; and (3) the horny layer of keratinocytes in this skin model is thinner than that of keratinocytes in real human skin. In order to overcome these problems, a new three-dimensional human skin model utilizing a handy scaffold of collagen vitrigel membrane (VG-KDF-Skin) was constructed. As a result, after 14 days incubation, the epidermis layer of normal human keratinocytes was thicker than the keratinocyte layer of KDF-Skin. The incubation period for VG-KDF-Skin construction was 7 days shorter than that of KDF-Skin, and the number of fibroblasts needed to seed VG-KDF-Skin was four times fewer than that of KDF-Skin. After the application of sensitizers such as DNCB. VG-KDF-Skin induced the expression of CD86 and cytokine release. These results suggest that the new three-dimensional human skin model consisting of dendritic cells, keratinocytes, fibroblasts and collagen vitrigel membrane was more useful for alternative animal testing than the KDF-Skin model. (C) 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available