4.5 Article

Anti-thyroid hormone activity of bisphenol A, tetrabromobisphenol A and tetrachlorobisphenol A in an improved reporter gene assay

Journal

TOXICOLOGY IN VITRO
Volume 23, Issue 5, Pages 950-954

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.tiv.2009.05.004

Keywords

Thyroid hormones receptor; Reporter gene assay; Bisphenol A; Tetrabromobisphenol A; Tetrachlorobisphenol A

Categories

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [30771830]
  2. young scientist Foundation of Jiangsu provincial Center for Disease Prevention and Control

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Previously, we transiently transfected Gal4-fused thyroid hormone receptor (TR) expressing vector and the Gal4 response reporter structure pUAS-tk-luc into HepG2 cell, developed a TR beta-1 mediated reporter gene assay to screen for compounds that acted on the TR signaling pathway. in this study, we improved the test efficiency by changing the transfected cell line into CV-1 cell. Triiodothyronine (T3) and thyroxine (T4) induced higher luciferase expression, with the median effective concentration (EC50) of 1.16 x 10(-8) and 1.36 x 10(-7) M, respectively. Bisphenol A (BPA) was selected as a positive antagonist, exhibiting weak anti-thyroid hormone activity with the median inhibitory concentration (IC50) Of 1.64 x 10(-5) M. The assay showed acceptable repeatability to T3 with inter coefficient of variability (CV) 27.5% and intra CV of 18.6%. Two flame retardants, tetrabromobis phenol A (TBBPA) and tetrachlorobiosphenol (TCBPA), were tested for their agonist and antagonist activities. As a result, we found that both of them possessed TR antagonist activity and neither of them showed agonist activity. These results suggested that TBBPA and TCBPA could act as TH antagonists. This assay provided a useful tool for the assessment of environmental chemicals as thyroid system disruptors. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available