4.5 Article

Multiendpoint mechanistic profiling of hepatotoxicants in HepG2/C3A human hepatoma cells and novel statistical approaches for development of a prediction model for acute hepatotoxicity

Journal

TOXICOLOGY IN VITRO
Volume 22, Issue 6, Pages 1618-1631

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.tiv.2008.04.016

Keywords

hepatotoxicity; HepG2/C3A cells; mechanistic profiling; prediction model; discriminant analysis

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

HepG2/C3A human hepatoma cells were exposed to serial concentrations of seven known hepatotoxicants for 48 h. Six endpoint assays were selected to model different mechanisms of acute hepatotoxicity. Each compound produced a unique concentration-response pattern across all endpoints. The endpoints did not correlate strongly, suggesting that each endpoint monitored an independent cellular process. Prediction models were developed using five statistical methods. The models used only known hepatotoxicants for the training set. The zero concentration (control) and all concentrations not significantly different from control were programmed as non-toxic levels and concentrations significantly different from control as toxic levels. So, rather than a binary classification of each compound (i.e., toxic or nontoxic), the models gave a prediction of the concentration, if any, at which a compound showed behavior similar to liver toxicants at their toxic concentrations. The discriminant analysis model gave the best overall performance with positive and negative predictive values of 1.00 and 0.83, respectively. Ten additional compounds were tested using this prediction model. The model predicted liver active concentrations for each compound that were consistent with their known biologically active concentrations. This model system may be useful for predicting concentration levels at which unknown compounds would display undesirable liver activity. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available