4.1 Article

Effects of low-dose, long-term formaldehyde exposure on the structure and functions of the ovary in rats

Journal

TOXICOLOGY AND INDUSTRIAL HEALTH
Volume 29, Issue 7, Pages 609-615

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/0748233711430983

Keywords

Formaldehyde; reproduction toxicity; ovary; oxidative stress; rat

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [30700654]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central University [XJJ 2011024]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Formaldehyde (FA) is a ubiquitous environmental pollutant. However, the effects of FA exposure on reproduction are still a matter of scientific controversy. In this study, we assessed the ovarian toxicity of long-term, low-dose FA exposure in rats and explored the potential oxidative stress mechanisms. A total of 30 Sprague-Dawley female rats were randomly allotted to three groups, in which rats were exposed to FA at a dose of 0 mg/m(3) (control), 0.5 mg/m(3) and 2.46 mg/m(3), respectively, by inhalation consecutively for 60 days. The results showed that the ovarian toxicity of FA is dose dependent. Ovarian structure and function in the group of rats exposed to 0.5 mg/m(3) FA showed no obvious difference when compared with those in the control group. However, the activity of superoxide dismutase was significantly decreased, whereas the level of malondialdehyde was significantly increased in ovaries of rats exposed to 2.46 mg/m(3) FA. Moreover, histopathological results demonstrated that the number and size of mature follicles significantly decreased, vascular congestion and interstitial edema in the ovaries of rats exposed to 2.46 mg/m(3) FA. In conclusion, this study may suggest that the FA level of 0.5 mg/m(3) can be considered as a safe level for FA exposure, but long-term FA exposure at a dose of 2.46 mg/m(3) has a harmful effect on ovary by inducing oxidative stress.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available