4.6 Article

Interaction of osteopontin with neutrophil α4β1 and α9β1 integrins in a rodent model of alcoholic liver disease

Journal

TOXICOLOGY AND APPLIED PHARMACOLOGY
Volume 233, Issue 2, Pages 238-246

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.taap.2008.08.008

Keywords

Chemokine; Chemokinesis; Ethanol; Inflammation; Neutrophils; Steatohepatitis

Funding

  1. NIAAA NIH HHS [AA016316] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Previous studies from our laboratory have reported that osteopontin (OPN) mediated higher hepatic neutrophil infiltration makes female rats more susceptible to alcoholic steatohepatitis (ASH) than their male counterparts. The objective of the current work was to investigate the partho-mechanism by which OPN attracts the hepatic neutorphils in ASH. We hypothesized that OPN-mediated hepatic neutrophil infiltration is a result of signaling by N-terminal integrin binding motif (SLAYGLR) of OPN through its receptor alpha(9)beta(1) (VLA9) and alpha(4)beta(1) (VLA4) integrins on neutrophils. Compared to the males, females in the ASH group exhibited higher expression of alpha(4)beta(1) and alpha(9)beta(1) protein and mRNA and a significant decrease in the expression of these integrins was observed in rats treated with neutralizing OPN antibody. immunoprecipitation experiments suggested the binding of CPN to OPN and alpha(4)beta(1) and alpha(9)beta(1) integrins. OPN-mediated neutrophils infiltration was also confirmed using Boyden chamber assays, and antibodies directed against alpha(4)beta(1) and alpha(9)beta(1) integrins was found to significantly inhibit neutrophilic migration in vitro. In conclusion, these data suggest that SLAYGLR-mediated alpha 4 beta 1 and alpha(9)beta(1) integrin signaling may be responsible for higher hepatic neutrophil infiltration and higher liver injury in the rat ASH model. (C) 2008 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available