4.6 Article

Mitochondria as an important target in heavy metal toxicity in rat hepatoma AS-30D cells

Journal

TOXICOLOGY AND APPLIED PHARMACOLOGY
Volume 231, Issue 1, Pages 34-42

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.taap.2008.03.017

Keywords

cadmium; copper; mercury; mitochondria; membrane potential; reactive oxygen species (ROS); apoptosis; toxicity; hepatoma

Funding

  1. Russian Foundation [07-04-00722]
  2. Polish State Committee [3010923213407]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The mechanisms of toxic effects of divalent cations of three heavy metals Hg, Cd and Cu in rat ascites hepatoma AS-30D cells cultivated in vitro were compared. It was found that the toxicity of these ions, applied in the micromolar range (10-500 mu M), decreased from Hg2+ (Most toxic) to Cu2+ (least toxic). Hg2+ and Cd2+ produced a high percentage of cell death by both necrosis and apoptosis, whereas Cu2+ at concentrations up to 500 mu M was weakly effective. Hg2+ at concentration of 10 mu M appeared slightly uncoupling (i.e., stimulated resting state respiration and decreased the mitochondrial transmernbrane potential), whereas it exerted a strong inhibitory effect on the respiratory chain and rapid dissipation of the membrane potential at higher concentrations. Cu2+ had inhibitory effect on cell respiration only at 500 mu M concentration and after incubation of 48 h but produced a significant uncoupling effect at lower concentrations. Cu2+ induced an early and sharp increase of intracellular production of reactive oxygen species (RCS). The action of Hg2+ and Cd2+ on ROS generation was biphasic. They stimulated ROS generation within the cells at low concentrations and at short incubation times but decreased ROS generation at higher concentrations and at longer incubation. It is concluded that mitochondria are an important target for toxic effects of Hg2+, Cd2+ and Cu2+ in AS-30D rat hepatoma cells. (c) 2008 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available