4.7 Article

Oxidative stress-induced cytotoxic and genotoxic effects of nano-sized titanium dioxide particles in human HaCaT keratinocytes

Journal

TOXICOLOGY
Volume 296, Issue 1-3, Pages 27-36

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.tox.2012.02.016

Keywords

Titanium dioxide nano-sized particles; Ultraviolet A; Reactive oxygen species; Mitochondrial common deletion; Apoptosis; Micronucleus

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Since nano-sized particles (NPs) are increasingly used in various fields of innovative biomedicine and industrial technologies, it is of importance to identify their potential human health risk. We investigated whether ROS-induced mitochondrial DNA damage is the mode of action of titanium dioxide-NPs (TiO2-NPs; <= 20 nm) to induce cytotoxic and genotoxic effects in human HaCaT keratinocytes in vitro. We showed that TiO2-NPs accumulate at the cell surface and are taken up by endocytosis. Micronucleus (MN) formation was found to be significantly maximal increased 24 h after treatment with 10 mu g/ml and 48 h after treatment with 5 mu g/ml TiO2-NPs about 1.8-fold respectively 2.2-fold of control. Mitochondrial DNA damage measured as common deletion was observed to be significantly 14-fold increased 72 h after treatment with 10 mu g/ml TiO2-NPs when compared to control. Four hours after treatment with 5 and 50 mu g/ml TiO2-NPs the level of ROS in HaCaT cells was found to be significantly increased about 7.5-fold respectively 16.7-fold of control. In conclusion, for the first time we demonstrate the induction of the mitochondrial common deletion in HaCaT cells following exposure to TiO2-NPs, which strongly suggests a ROS-mediated cytotoxic and genotoxic potential of NPs. However, the effects of the modification of TiO2-NPs, such as agglomeration, size distribution pattern and exposure time have to be further critically examined. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available