4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

PPARα:: Mechanism of species differences and hepatocarcinogenesis of peroxisome proliferators

Journal

TOXICOLOGY
Volume 246, Issue 1, Pages 2-8

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.tox.2007.09.030

Keywords

PPAR; peroxisome proliferators; humanized mice; nuclear receptors; microRNA; Wy-14,643; Fenofibrate; hepatocellular proliferation

Funding

  1. Intramural NIH HHS Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Peroxisome proliferator chemicals are classic non-genotoxic carcinogens. These agents cause liver cancers when chronically administered to rats and mice. Peroxisome proliferators include the widely prescribed lipid and cholesterol lowering fibrate drugs. In contrast to the results in rodents, there is no evidence that fibrates are associated with elevated risk of liver cancer or any other neoplasms in humans thus indicating a species difference in the hepatocarcinogenic response. The biological effects of peroxisome proliferators are mediated by the peroxisome proliferatoractivated receptor (PPAR)alpha. Ppar alpha-null mice are resistant to all of the pleiotropic effects of peroxisome proliferators, including cell proliferation and hepatocarcinogenesis. The mechanism of hepatocellular proliferation involves downregulation of the microRNA let-7c gene by PPAR(X. Let-7c controls levels of proliferative c-myc by destabilizing its mRNA. Thus, upon suppression of let-7c, c-myc mRNA and protein are elevated resulting in enhanced hepatocellular proliferation. In contrast, PPAR alpha-humanized mice, that respond to Wy-14,643 by lower serum triglycerides and induction of genes encoding fatty acid metabolizing enzymes, are resistant to peroxisome proliferator-induced cell proliferation and cancer. These mice do not exhibit downregulation of let-7c gene expression thus forming the basis for the resistance to hepatocellular carcinogenesis. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available