4.7 Article

Cytotoxicity of folpet fungicide on human bronchial epithelial cells

Journal

TOXICOLOGY
Volume 249, Issue 2-3, Pages 160-166

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.tox.2008.05.003

Keywords

folpet; particles; fungicide; cytotoxicity; respiratory toxicity; oxidative stress; lipid peroxydation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Folpet, a widely used dicarboximide fungicide, has been detected in the ambient air of several vine-growing regions of France. It is present in particle form in the environment; however, no study exploring its potential health impact on airways and the respiratory system has been published. Here, the biological effect of these particles was investigated in vitro on human bronchial epithelial cells (16HBE14o-). To be close to the real-life conditions exposure, Folpan 80WGO (R), a commercial form of folpet, was tested. Folpan 80WGO particles showed dose- and time-dependent cytotoxic effects on 16HBE14o- cells. This effect was compared to that produced by technical-grade folpet and both were found to induce a toxicity with similar IC50 values after 24h of exposure. After 4h and at least until 48h of exposure, the IC50 values of Folpan 80WG (R) particles were between 2.4 and 2.8 mu g/cm(2). Investigation of the cytotoxicity found that Folpan 80WGO particles at 1.85 mu g/cm(2) induced an increase in ROS production from the first hour of exposure. Evidence that oxidative processes occur in folpet-exposed cells was confirmed by the presence of membrane lipid peroxidation. Furthermore, early apoptosis and late apoptosis/necrosis were both present after the first hour of exposure. These findings indicate that exposure to Folpan 80WG (R) particles result in a rapid cytotoxic effect on human bronchial epithelial cells in vitro that could be in part explained by oxidative stress, characterised by membrane lipid peroxiclation and ROS production. (C) 2008 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available