4.5 Article

Testicular Effects Following In Utero Exposure to the Antivirals Acyclovir and Ganciclovir in Rats

Journal

TOXICOLOGICAL SCIENCES
Volume 139, Issue 1, Pages 220-233

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/toxsci/kfu024

Keywords

acyclovir; ganciclovir; testis; rats; gestation

Categories

Funding

  1. Coordination for Enhancement of Higher Education Personnel (CAPES
  2. PROAP)
  3. Coordination for Enhancement of Higher Education Personnel (CAPES/REUNI)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In utero exposure to the antivirals acyclovir and ganciclovir has been reported to induce gross structural defects in rat offspring. The present study investigated the effects of maternal antiviral treatment on gestation day 10 on reproductive and nonreproductive organs in male rat offspring with a particular focus on the testes. Vehicle and two doses of acyclovir and ganciclovir, 75 and 300 mg/kg, were administered to rat dams. The total doses were fractioned into three subcutaneous applications (3 x distilled water, 3 x 25 mg/kg, and 3 x 100 mg/kg) that were administered on gestation day 10 at 8:00 a.m., 1:00 p.m., and 6:00 p.m. The antiviral concentrations were measured in the serum of the dams 1 h after the last administration. Exposure to 300 mg/kg ganciclovir induced germ cell deficiency in both fetal and adult testes, an effect that was not seen in any other treatment group. Adult rats exposed in utero to this high ganciclovir dose exhibited Sertoli cell-only tubules intermingled with seminiferous tubules that displayed a normal size and normal cell counts, alterations that resemble focal Sertoli cell-only syndrome in humans. The serum concentrations of ganciclovir were markedly higher than those of acyclovir, particularly at the high dose tested. However, although 300 mg/kg acyclovir did not induce germ cell deficiency, other specific effects were seen in exposed animals, including incomplete eye opening and reduced thymus weight.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available