4.5 Article

Cadmium Induces Anemia through Interdependent Progress of Hemolysis, Body Iron Accumulation, and Insufficient Erythropoietin Production in Rats

Journal

TOXICOLOGICAL SCIENCES
Volume 122, Issue 1, Pages 198-210

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/toxsci/kfr100

Keywords

cadmium; anemia; iron; erythropoietin; hemolysis; rat

Categories

Funding

  1. Ministry of Education, Science, and Culture of Japan [18590569]
  2. JKA through KEIRIN RACE
  3. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [18590569] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Cadmium is a toxic heavy metal and distributed widely in the environment. In addition to damaging the liver, kidneys, and bone, cadmium causes anemia through hemolysis, iron deficiency, and insufficient erythropoietin (EPO) production (renal anemia) along with changes in iron metabolism. Here, we investigated the role of iron in the interdependent progress of three types of anemia in cadmium-injected rats fed iron-sufficient or iron-deficient diets for 1 or 3 months. Cadmium injections for 1 month induced renal anemia without renal injury. Injections for 3 months induced hemolysis, iron deficiency, and renal anemia, accompanied by hepatic and renal damage. Iron concentrations in the liver, kidney, and spleen were increased, derived from internally released iron from hemolyzed red blood cells, increased duodenal iron absorption, insufficient erythropoiesis, and hepatic ferritin overproduced by cadmium-induced interleukin-6. Therefore, the iron deficiency anemia was actually apparent. Cadmium suppressed renal EPO production through a direct effect, accumulated iron, and destruction of EPO-producing cells. Increased duodenal iron absorption could be attributed to hypertrophy of the duodenal mucosa derived from anemia. Thus, insufficient EPO production and iron accumulation are the central factors driving anemia in cadmium toxicity.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available