4.0 Review

The Nonclinical Safety Profile of GalNAc-conjugated RNAi Therapeutics in Subacute Studies

Journal

TOXICOLOGIC PATHOLOGY
Volume 46, Issue 7, Pages 735-745

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/0192623318792537

Keywords

cell(ular) pathology; drug development; liver; monkey pathology; preclinical research and development; preclinical safety assessment/risk management; rat pathology

Funding

  1. Alnylam Pharmaceuticals

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Short interfering RNAs (siRNAs) and antisense oligonucleotides (ASOs) are the most clinically advanced oligonucleotide-based platforms. A number of N-acetylgalactosamine (GalNAc)-conjugated siRNAs (GalNAc-siRNAs), also referred to as RNA interference (RNAi) therapeutics, are currently in various stages of development, though none is yet approved. While the safety of ASOs has been the subject of extensive review, the nonclinical safety profiles of GalNAc-siRNAs have not been reported. With the exception of sequence differences that confer target RNA specificity, GalNAc-siRNAs are largely chemically uniform, containing limited number of phosphorothioate linkages, and 2'-O-methyl and 2'-deoxy-2'-fluoro ribose modifications. Here, we present the outcomes of short-term (3-5 week) rat and monkey weekly repeat-dose toxicology studies of six Enhanced Stabilization Chemistry GalNAc-siRNAs currently in clinical development. In nonclinical studies at supratherapeutic doses, these molecules share similar safety signals, with histologic findings in the organ of pharmacodynamic effect (liver), the organ of elimination (kidney), and the reticuloendothelial system (lymph nodes). The majority of these changes are nonadverse, partially to completely reversible, correlate well with pharmacokinetic parameters and tissue distribution, and often reflect drug accumulation. Furthermore, all GalNAc-siRNAs tested to date have been negative in genotoxicity and safety pharmacology studies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available