4.6 Article

Transcriptome Sequencing Reveals Potential Mechanism of Cryptic 3′ Splice Site Selection in SF3B1-mutated Cancers

Journal

PLOS COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY
Volume 11, Issue 3, Pages -

Publisher

PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004105

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. University of California, San Diego, Genetics Training Program through an institutional training grant from the National Institute of General Medical Sciences [T32GM008666]
  2. California Institute for Regenerative Medicine (CIRM) Interdisciplinary Stem Cell Training Program at UCSD II [TG2-01154]
  3. UCSD Cancer Center Training Grant in Drug Development - the Cancer Therapeutics Training Program [T32CA121938]
  4. National Cancer Institute [1R21CA152613]
  5. National Institutes of Health CLL Research Consortium grant [PO1CA81534]
  6. CIRM Highly Active Anti-Leukemia Stem Cell Therapy (HALT) team [DR1-01430]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Mutations in the splicing factor SF3B1 are found in several cancer types and have been associated with various splicing defects. Using transcriptome sequencing data from chronic lymphocytic leukemia, breast cancer and uveal melanoma tumor samples, we show that hundreds of cryptic 3' splice sites (3'SSs) are used in cancers with SF3B1 mutations. We define the necessary sequence context for the observed cryptic 3'SSs and propose that cryptic 3' SS selection is a result of SF3B1 mutations causing a shift in the sterically protected region downstream of the branch point. While most cryptic 3'SSs are present at low frequency (<10%) relative to nearby canonical 3'SSs, we identified ten genes that preferred out-of-frame cryptic 3'SSs. We show that cancers with mutations in the SF3B1 HEAT 5-9 repeats use cryptic 3'SSs downstream of the branch point and provide both a mechanistic model consistent with published experimental data and affected targets that will guide further research into the oncogenic effects of SF3B1 mutation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available