4.6 Article

GOBLET: The Global Organisation for Bioinformatics Learning, Education and Training

Journal

PLOS COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY
Volume 11, Issue 4, Pages -

Publisher

PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004143

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. EU FP7 AllBio project [289452]
  2. Ontario Institute for Cancer Research
  3. Government of Ontario
  4. UK's BBSRC
  5. BBSRC [BBS/E/T/000PR5885, BBS/E/T/000PR6193] Funding Source: UKRI
  6. MRC [MR/K001744/1, G0900740] Funding Source: UKRI
  7. NERC [NBAF010003] Funding Source: UKRI
  8. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BBS/E/T/000PR6193, BBS/E/T/000PR5885] Funding Source: researchfish
  9. Medical Research Council [G0900740, MR/K001744/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  10. Natural Environment Research Council [NBAF010003] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In recent years, high-throughput technologies have brought big data to the life sciences. The march of progress has been rapid, leaving in its wake a demand for courses in data analysis, data stewardship, computing fundamentals, etc., a need that universities have not yet been able to satisfy-paradoxically, many are actually closing niche bioinformatics courses at a time of critical need. The impact of this is being felt across continents, as many students and early-stage researchers are being left without appropriate skills to manage, analyse, and interpret their data with confidence. This situation has galvanised a group of scientists to address the problems on an international scale. For the first time, bioinformatics educators and trainers across the globe have come together to address common needs, rising above institutional and international boundaries to cooperate in sharing bioinformatics training expertise, experience, and resources, aiming to put ad hoc training practices on a more professional footing for the benefit of all.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available