4.1 Article

Swelling and Mechanical Properties of Alginate Hydrogels with Respect to Promotion of Neural Growth

Journal

TISSUE ENGINEERING PART C-METHODS
Volume 20, Issue 5, Pages 401-411

Publisher

MARY ANN LIEBERT, INC
DOI: 10.1089/ten.tec.2013.0252

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. German Research Foundation (DFG)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Soft alginate hydrogels support robust neurite outgrowth, but their rapid disintegration in solutions of high ionic strength restricts them from long-term in vivo applications. Aiming to enhance the mechanical stability of soft alginate hydrogels, we investigated how changes in pH and ionic strength during gelation influence the swelling, stiffness, and disintegration of a three-dimensional (3D) alginate matrix and its ability to support neurite outgrowth. Hydrogels were generated from dry alginate layers through ionic crosslinks with Ca2+ (10mM) in solutions of low or high ionic strength and at pH 5.5 or 7.4. High- and low-viscosity alginates with different molecular compositions demonstrated pH and ionic strength-independent increases in hydrogel volume with decreases in Ca2+ concentrations from 10 to 2mM. Only soft hydrogels that were synthesized in the presence of 150mM of NaCl (Ca-alginate(NaCl)) displayed long-term volume stability in buffered physiological saline, whereas analogous hydrogels generated in NaCl-free conditions (Ca-alginate) collapsed. The stiffnesses of Ca-alginate(NaCl) hydrogels elevated from 0.01 to 19kPa as the Ca2+-concentration was raised from 2 to 10mM; however, only Ca-alginate(NaCl) hydrogels with an elastic modulus 1.5kPa that were generated with 4mM of Ca2+ supported robust neurite outgrowth in primary neuronal cultures. In conclusion, soft Ca-alginate(NaCl) hydrogels combine mechanical stability in solutions of high ionic strength with the ability to support neural growth and could be useful as 3D implants for neural regeneration in vivo.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available